Konten Prank Youtuber Sebagai Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

Youtuber Prank Content as a Crime Under the Information and Electronic Transactions Law

  • I Wayan Budha Yasa Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Gede Yudiarta Wiguna Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Keywords: Prank Content, Youtuber, Crime

Abstract

Prank is a form of joke or joke that is intentionally made by someone with the intention of pranking or pranking other people with the aim of creating a sense of satisfaction for the prank maker. There are various types of pranks that are generally made to be later used as personal or group content available on various social media such as YouTube. Prank content created by someone like a YouTuber (YouTube content creator) can be considered a crime, even if a prank is a joke or a joke. This is because someone who is a victim of this prank may be harmed or their rights may be violated. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze YouTuber prank content which can be categorized as a crime under the Information and Electronic Transactions Act and the regulation of YouTuber prank content which is categorized as a crime in the Electronic Information and Transactions Act. The method used in this research is normative juridical using a legal and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials used is document study by examining primary and secondary legal materials. The method of analyzing legal materials is carried out in a normative juridical manner which is presented descriptively. Based on the results and discussion of this research, it was found that YouTuber prank content which can be categorized as a criminal offense under the Information and Electronic Transactions Act is prank content that contains content that violates decency, insults and/or defamation, and can cause hatred or hostility of certain individuals and/or community groups based on ethnicity, religion, race, and inter-group (SARA). Then it was found that, the regulation regarding YouTuber prank content which is categorized as a crime in The Information and Electronic Transaction Law is regulated in Article 27 paragraph (1) and (3) junto Article 45 paragraph (1) and (3) and Article 28 paragraph (2) junto Article 45A paragraph (2).

References

Buku

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. 2016. “Hukum Pidana”. Tanggerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.

Hiariej Eddy O.S.. 2020. “Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi”. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Jurnal/Artikel Ilmiah

Ahmad, A. (2012). Perkembangan Teknologi Komunikasi Dan Informasi. Dakwah Tabligh.

Barus, Z. (2013). Analisis Filosofis Tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Penelitian Hukum Sosiologis. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum.

Huda, N. (2019). Prank Dan Dampak Sosial : Kajian Pendidikan Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam. Ta’dibi : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam.

Isnawan, F. (2021). Konten Prank Sebagai Krisis Moral Remaja di Era Milenial Dalam Pan-dangan Psikologi Hukum dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v12i1.10207

Jayantari, I. G. A. S. (2019). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dokumen Elektronik dalam Tindak Pidana Berbasis Teknologi dan Informasi (Cyber Crime). Kertha Wichara.

Labas, Y. N., & Yasmine, D. I. (2017). Komodifikasi di Era Masyarakat Jejaring: Studi Kasus YouTube Indonesia. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v4i2.28584

Nasution, R. D. (2017). Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Terhadap Eksistensi Budaya Lokal. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik.

Safitri, R. (2018). Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Bagi Perguruan Tinggi. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v5i3.10279

Supanto. (2016). Perkembangan Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) Dan Antisipasinya Dengan Penal Policy. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum.

Ulya, H. (2019). Komodifikasi Pekerja Pada Youtuber Pemula dan Underrated (Studi Kasus YouTube Indonesia). Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.8.2.1-12

Ningsih, Dwi Wachidiyah dan Karim, Abdul. -. Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Prank Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Penghinaan Yang Diunggah Di Media Online). Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gresik.

Purwolwksono, H. Didik Endro. 2017. Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Media Sosial. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.

Internet

Anonim. 2020. Lelucon Terapan.Tersedia di : https://id.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lelucon_terapan tanggal Diakses pada tanggal 13 Agustus 2021.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. [Online]. Tersedia di https://kbbi.web.id/senda.--gurau.html. Diakses pada 14 Agustus 2021.

Rachmawati. 2020. 7 Kasus Prank di Tahun 2020, Melibatkan Youtuber Ferdian hingga Bagi-bagi Daging Isi Sampah. Tersedia di : https://regional.kompas.com/read/2020/12/25/10500071/7-kasus-prank-di-tahun-2020-melibatkan-youtuber-ferdian-hingga-bagi-bagi?page=1. Diakses pada tanggal 13 Agustus 2021.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Published
2021-08-15
How to Cite
Yasa, I. W. B., & Wiguna, G. Y. (2021). Konten Prank Youtuber Sebagai Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 7(2), 631-644. https://doi.org/10.15294/snhunnes.v7i2.738