Comparison of Students Learning Outcomes for SNMPTN and SBMPTN Selection Pathways of the Automotive Engineering Education Study Program

Authors

  • Ahmad Arif Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Nuzul Hidayat Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Nizwardi Jalinus Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Ridwan Ridwan Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rijal Abdullah Universitas Negeri Padang
  • M. Yasep Setiawan Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Wawan Purwanto Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Wagino Wagino Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Martias Martias Universitas Negeri Padang

Keywords:

Comparisons, Learning Outcomes, Selection Pathways, Students.

Abstract

The different student learning outcomes of the Automotive Engineering Education Study Program FT UNP, serve as the context for this research. Several factors, both internal and external to the student, influence learning results, one of which is the decision to participate in PTN. This study is a comparative descriptive study that compares the learning results of 74 students accepted into the Automotive Engineering Education Study Program FT UNP, through the SNMPTN and SBMPTN entering years in 2019 and 2020. The sampling technique used total sampling, which sampled the entire population, comprising 74 people, with details of SNMPTN and SBMPTN pupils totaling 37 people each. The t-test is used in the data analysis technique, which was formerly performed by the normalcy test. Based on the results of the t-test, the null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted and the working hypothesis (Ha) is rejected (-ttable ≤ tcount ≤ +ttable : -1.980 ≤ -0.1267 ≤ 1.980). It can be concluded that there is no significant difference in learning outcomes between SNMPTN and SBMPTN students in the 2019 and 2020 batches of the FT UNP Automotive Engineering Education Study Program at the 95% confidence level. Those entering SNMPTN generally have a higher mean value than those entering SBMPTN.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles